Table of Contents
The View from Moscow: No Trust, No Treaty
Russia China distrust of West is no longer just speculation—it’s a defining force behind the Ukraine war, economic realignment, and the emerging global divide. For many in Russia, the idea of negotiating peace with Ukraine is no longer on the table. The belief taking root is that only an unconditional surrender by Kyiv can end the war. Why? Because, from their perspective, the West cannot be trusted to honour any agreement.
After decades of broken promises—whether on NATO expansion, Minsk agreements, or energy guarantees—Russia sees the West as a power that offers one hand while hiding a dagger in the other. The notion of a “rules-based international order” has, in Russian eyes, come to mean rules that apply to everyone except the United States and its closest allies.
This is not just a war against Ukraine. In the Russian narrative, it is a war against Western encroachment, cultural colonisation, and the betrayal of post-Cold War assurances. Moscow’s strategic calculation is no longer about territorial gains or political leverage—it’s about breaking the cycle of humiliation that began with the collapse of the Soviet Union and continued through waves of NATO expansion and colour revolutions.
To stop now, many Russians believe, would mean more than losing face. It would mean validating the West’s long game: use local allies to destabilise Russia’s borderlands, draw Moscow into expensive regional conflicts, and weaken it economically through sanctions and proxy wars.
If Ukraine remains armed and Western-aligned, the war will simply restart in five or ten years, and next time it might not be in Donetsk—it could be in Crimea or even Belgorod. For Russia, this is now a war of existential stability.
And after sacrificing tens of thousands of lives, enduring sanctions, and shifting its entire economy to a wartime footing, the Russian people have become hardened to the cost. The sentiment is: we’ve come too far to turn back.
Beyond Ukraine: The Shattered Mirror of Western Democracy
Across Russia, China, and parts of the Global South, there’s a growing belief that the Western concept of democracy is not only flawed—it is fraudulent. It’s not just about ballot boxes and campaign slogans; it’s about the machinery behind them.
In the eyes of these nations, the West no longer leads by example. Instead, it dictates by force, manipulates by influence, and punishes disobedience with sanctions or intervention.
The suspicion is this: the West is not governed by elected leaders, but by something much deeper and more entrenched. A system of influence. A shadow network. An unelected power structure with its own goals, insulated from the public and immune to accountability.
Behind the Curtain: Who Really Runs the West?
1. Billionaire Donors and Super PACs
In the United States, political campaigns are no longer grassroots movements—they’re corporate investments. The 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court ruling effectively legalised unlimited spending in politics. Enter Super PACs, where billionaire donors shape national agendas through money, not merit.
From George Soros to the Koch Brothers, a handful of ultra-wealthy individuals fund think tanks, media outlets, and both political parties. They back candidates who promise “change” but deliver the same.
2. Lobbying Giants and the Revolving Door
Washington is flooded with over 12,000 registered lobbyists. Many are former lawmakers, now working for corporations they once regulated. And when their lobbying stint ends? They return to government. This “revolving door” ensures that big business always has a seat at the table, no matter who wins elections.
Major sectors like Big Pharma, Wall Street, and the military-industrial complex spend billions annually influencing policy decisions. The outcomes often serve shareholders, not citizens.
3. Think Tanks: The Ideological Manufacturers
Elite institutions like the Council on Foreign Relations, Atlantic Council, and Brookings Institution play a crucial role in shaping foreign policy. These organisations publish white papers, host summits, and brief journalists—but they’re also funded by weapons manufacturers, oil companies, and tech giants.
They create the intellectual framework that justifies interventions, sanctions, and regime change—all while appearing neutral and scholarly.
4. Media Conglomerates and Narrative Control
Once the watchdog, now the lapdog. The Western press is largely owned by a few conglomerates with deep political and corporate ties. Editorial boards increasingly push narratives that favour military action, corporate consolidation, and establishment politics.
The result? News that resembles public relations, not journalism. Viewers are offered the illusion of choice, but all channels lead to the same messaging.
A System Built Not to Change
Politicians make promises, but the system remains unchanged. Regulatory capture, legalised bribery, and media manipulation have locked Western politics into a loop. It’s why meaningful reform feels impossible.
Every four years, the public is offered a binary choice. But for critics like Russia and China, that’s not democracy—that’s managed consent. The electorate votes, but the outcome rarely challenges the underlying power structure.
From the outside, this looks like hypocrisy. Preaching democracy abroad while practising plutocracy at home. For the so-called “Rebel Alliance” of Russia, China, and others, this contradiction is impossible to ignore.
Enter the ‘Rebel Alliance’: The Push for a Multipolar World
The rise of BRICS, the expansion of Chinese influence, and the increasing assertiveness of Russia are not random. They’re strategic.
These nations are building an alternative system—one that rejects dollar hegemony, NATO dominance, and Western cultural export. In its place, they offer sovereignty, non-intervention, and multipolar cooperation.
Yes, these countries have their own flaws. Authoritarianism, censorship, and corruption exist in abundance. But from their perspective, the Western model is no longer the moral high ground. It’s just a different form of control.
And to many in the Global South, the rise of alternative powers is not a threat—it’s a correction.
Internal Links:
External Link Suggestions:
- OpenSecrets.org – Top Political Donors
- RAND Corporation Think Tank Overview
- The Revolving Door Database (CRP)
Reader Comments
- Has the West lost the right to lecture others on democracy?
- Are Russia and China offering a genuine alternative or simply rebranding authoritarianism?
- And can a multipolar world create real balance—or just new forms of manipulation?
👇 Add your voice below. We don’t just allow comments. We encourage them.
We want to hear your what you have to say