In this article
A Tradition Gets the Tech Treatment
Wimbledon electronic line-calling has officially taken centre court in 2025, eliminating all human line judges in a tech twist no one saw coming.. Wimbledon electronic line-calling is now fully live. The world’s most prestigious tennis tournament has swapped crisp-blazered humans for tireless, emotionless machines.
Yes, you read that right. For the first time in its genteel, strawberry-scented history, the world’s most prestigious tennis tournament has swapped crisp-blazered humans for tireless, emotionless machines. Wimbledon has gone full electronic line-calling—and there’s no turning back unless someone hacks the system mid-match to rerun the 1980 final.
What Exactly Is Electronic Line-Calling?
The system in question, Hawk-Eye Live, has been making quiet inroads into tennis for years. Originally used for replays and challenges, it now does the calling in real time—no human intervention needed. If the ball’s out, a synthetic voice announces it with all the charisma of a train delay notification.
This year, Wimbledon finally pulled the plug on people altogether. No more line judges. No more questionable calls. No more iconic moments of players yelling “You cannot be serious!” at someone with a pulse. Just cool, calculated AI precision.
The Ghost of Line Judges Past
Line judges have been part of Wimbledon since 1877, when matches were officiated by men in bowler hats who may or may not have been watching. Over time, their fashion improved, but their eyesight (according to some players) did not.
Still, they were a vital part of the tournament’s charm. The respectful nods. The stiff posture. The occasional eye twitch when Novak Djokovic smashed a racket near their shins. Now, their roles have been reallocated—some to ball change monitoring, others to… well, it’s best not to ask.
One unnamed official told Newsfangled, “I’ve gone from calling balls to counting towels. The machine doesn’t even make mistakes I can correct.”
Reactions from Players, Fans… and Robots
Some players love it. “It’s fair,” said one top-10 seed. “No more bias. No more shouting. No more wondering if that dodgy foot-fault was personal.” Others were less thrilled: “I miss yelling at someone,” admitted a seeded favourite. “Shouting at a machine just makes me look unhinged.”
Fans, meanwhile, are torn. The accuracy is undeniable. But is it tennis without the tension of a disputed call? And what happens when the robots start forming unions?
A satirical petition is already circulating online: Bring Back Bob—the Line Judge Who Blinked but Still Called It In.
The Future of Human Officials
Wimbledon insists this is about “modernisation,” “accuracy,” and “player welfare”—all good things. But there’s an underlying shift here, one we’ve seen across industries: automation is coming for everyone. Even the people who shout “OUT!” with authority and wear navy suits on 30°C days.
The sport may never go back. Line-calling, like many human roles, has now been deemed optional. The question is: what do we lose when we gain perfection?
Perhaps in 2030, we’ll get emotional-AI line bots that occasionally get it wrong just to keep the drama alive. A little malfunction to make us feel human again.
Related Reading on Newsfangled:
- Chatbots in Charge: Are AI Therapists the Future or Just Creepy?
- The TikTok-ification of Britain: Is Our Culture Getting Dumber or Just Faster?
Read it? React to it.
Should we mourn the loss of human judges or embrace the era of robotic fairness? Comment below—we still read those manually. For now.
We want to hear your what you have to say